Camila Rodrigues Muscles

Request reconvening

The Chairman of the CC
SEE


the Mayor of Eboli
SEE





Subject: Centre for Equal Opportunities reconvening




Municipal Councillors, the undersigned demand the immediate convocation, according to the 'Art. 6 of the current regulation of the Centre for Equal Opportunities for you to proceed to a normal and regular election of representative bodies, and therefore the cancellation of the previous election of the same, as occurred in contravention by that regulation.


Eboli April 14, 2009

local councilors
Carmine Caprarella
Corset
Cosimo Antonio Pio
Antonio Di Benedetto Lamanna

Chica Follando En Colo

Center Equal Opportunity ... The City of Opportunities Learn ...

learn from the press that the election of the offices within the Centre for Equal Opportunities, and once Once we note, with bitterness, that the administration of city government does not respect the rules of democratic life, even in their most basic expressions.
Regulation for the establishment of the Centre says: "The Centre for Equal Opportunities is a body which aims to contribute to the effective implementation of the principles of equality and equality among citizens. " Well, we believe that this principle has failed at the outset, because you are not given the opportunity to all members nominated to participate. A
several city councilors, some time ago, you were asked to indicate their own component within the Centre. After the designation, there was a meeting in which they were "elected" president, vice president and secretary.
But it is not legitimate a meeting convened in writing by a body established by the City Council?
E 'is called on all political forces in Assisi to express their own "commissioner"?
have brought all these "commissioners" appointed?
have been invited those members designated by the opposition?
We is not!
Ironically, a body which was born out of the participation of citizens in administration has been limited in its peculiar function. The election of an office within the Centre was made for the consumption of the administration Melchionda, in a pre-packaged.
Perhaps they would not be "disturbed" by the presence of independent and autonomous subjects?
E 'usual behavior: grab also the tasks without compensation, while putting a pawn on the chessboard. As if the administrative capacity is measured by the management of the "power".
Mayor, once again, shows you want to create confusion among the citizens: the role of managing director
is not provided by any law or regulation. In the resolution of 20 n.45
May 2008, the City Council repealed the words "a delegate of the mayor" as part of the Centre and, consequently, the existence of this role. There is already the commissioner for Equal Opportunities, but we think that in this affair has had very little say. The mayor is contemptuous
Rules: appointment ago, thinking in their private office and not at the head of a government agency. Having de-legitimized the figure
councilor is somehow an act of confidence in it or just a way to ward off the advisers with small sweeteners?
It 's more simple name "delegate" a counselor and not a commissioner, not to deal with the political forces?
For these reasons we believe this election is invalid, and also addressed to the President of the City Council consider that guarantees the proper functioning of the structures of participation, we demand the annulment of the election of the governing bodies of the Centre for Equal Opportunities and the immediate reconvening of the same, according to the rules, that is given to all members appointed to participate and play an active role in the administrative life of the city.
If not, we will do everything in our power, with councilors and citizens to prevent the abuse again, accomplished by Melchionda.
People should not be deluded to participate: they must simply be allowed to do so!

When Is A Relaxer Expire

Resignation President Eboli Multiservice spa

The resignation of the President of Eboli Multiservice spa, Cosimo Naponiello, to whom I extend my personal thanks for their work and commitment, highlights once again the inconsistency, the inaction and neglect of the Administration also Melchionda.
For months I have urged the Administration to clarify the real intentions towards the company and its workers. The impression is that you want to take the company to "go out like a candle."
The Administration has never demonstrated an ability to address serious political, but has faced problems with the logic of "pulling a living."
Even the choice of becoming the sole shareholder, has led to the establishment of immediate consequential acts. It took months just for an adjustment of status! Sign
of indifference or worse than negligence.
In recent months a working group of the majority of Councillors had drawn up a time trial program of things to do by the administration, with specifications and regulations to be adopted, which was not prepared anyone. The President
Naponiello in recent months had set up a business plan, but the Administration did not respond to the tasks they deserve. It was preferred to outsource some services, rather than passing them to the company, with the same qualitative result. (See cemetery!)
Perhaps during an election year it is convenient to work outside rather than to a company Ente?
And what are the conditions that ensure the survival of the company if you do not give the services provided?
With the approval of the new Regulations, the Directors considered it appropriate to reduce the services that the company could carry, a sign of intention to reduce its potential.
He made another choice, which I opposed,: in the case of the resignation of one member of the Board of Directors decade. And this is one way to solve political problems and management?
and the ability to replace the Board of Directors, is it not a single administrator the solution to satisfy someone who "kicks", rather than protecting society?
And in recent months, we are sure that the President and the Board have been enabled to work calmly?
It was, however, support the CDA politically, support it through all possible services and of course check that the services are performed with a level of quality that meets the needs of citizens. But to do this was to be put in a position the company to work with tools and resources. And these resources have not been foreseen in the 2009 budget, so the decision to "pull a living" is obvious. Yet in the resolution of the Central Committee of 19 December 2007 was anticipated to be necessary to provide adequate fund balance for the company ..
But it is clear that this Administration, which does not respect any rules, does not take into account the guidelines of the City Council (see Plan taffic!).
Come to City Council the Mayor Melchionda to explain what the company wants to do, seriously, before making unnecessary political appointments, because it defines the future of the company and employees!
And please, that the Administration should not make the usual litany, the blame lies with those first, because at 6 years of this administration in society has managed 4!

Cellulitis Looks Like 2 Knees

A debate useless to hide the responsibility of the Administration

The City Council Monday, March 23, 2009 was clearly evident across the political and administrative control of the inability Melchionda. In an arbitrary manner has given rise to a debate on the issue of unnecessary and repetitive S. Nicola Varco. A footbridge electioneering, inconclusive, he saw this center-left majority vote on a resolution to prepare and that belongs to the center-right political positions.
The City Council had already lost his job working in the Social Policy Commission and voting on a resolution, the synthesis of more than one, in which to develop a comprehensive strategy to address the issues relating to immigration. Last night was serious administration, instead of talking about the political jargon, report on results achieved, critical issues that were not possible to achieve some goals and things to gangs in the field. An administration that without ideas and without a word did not match any data, no objective achieved, no part of the transactions made in the field.
Campania has repeatedly informed the design deficiencies of this administration, no administration that has brought us into this situation. Moreover, the March 16 majority approved a budget for 2009 where he had reported the intention to accept the its territory a reception center. And faced with this availability seems logical that those who have an interest in making the field for immigrants look with interest at Eboli.
But what has made in recent years for S. Melchionda Nicola Varco if not populism, statements of the facade, made unnecessary and unfunded projects. The Administrative Nothing.
the problem is serious. As citizens of Eboli we must assert that in the S. Nicola Varco will make a productive investment, and go quickly to the emptying of the current structure, which work in synergy, and creating institutional conflicts, for a solution to what a real problem of a humanitarian nature that exceeds considerations on the presence of regular and irregular. We must work with all the municipalities of the Piana del Sele you have to load some of these people. You must use the public facilities in the Plains, foster farms for installation of mobile facilities for these workers, you must create guarantee funds by the institutions, to facilitate the rent for housing of migrant workers.
But the most disturbing of the act is to allow the same operation that was going to do the Campania region in S. Nicola Varco in another area. So the question arises: have passed a resolution that gives carte blanche to deal with the Mayor Eboli for another location? And why was not clarified in the Resolution, where you want to do? And if an electoral calculation we wanted to avoid making it possible to install the container in some "feud" electioneering, such as other citizens of Eboli will have to pay the price of the Mayor's choices? And who are the owners of the areas that will be the proposal to install such container or trailer? And no way to differentiate a humanitarian disaster to those who need help?
Too many unanswered questions to vote on the resolution. Besides the fact that we were already expressed as a Council, it was incumbent administration to play its role. But this is an administration bankruptcy, unable, useless. What has made over the years? And in all these meetings have expressed concern that you have made with the regional councilors may not EXAMINED of these interventions? The doubt remains.